|
Brain Bulletin #37 - Who's Minding the Mind?
What's going on in there?
I attended the Daniel Siegel lecture in Vancouver last night on the Mindful
Brain. We were asked, "Do you have a mindful brain or is your brain on
auto-pilot?" In other words, do you notice what's going on in your brain?
It reminded me of a remarkable finding in a study I read recently. Here's
what happened:
A group of college students were asked to take a test involving mental
rotation. Male brains generally perform this task quicker and more
accurately than female brains. When the students, of both genders, were
asked questions that mentioned gender before the test the female students
scored 64% as many correct answers as the male students. However, when the
students were asked questions before the test that reminded them of their
identity as students in a prestigious university the women scored 84% as
many correct answers as men. This is a remarkable difference!
Why did this happen? The men in the study did better when they were reminded
of gender. The women did better when they were reminded that they were elite
students. Neither group was consciously aware of this!
I think this goes on around us all day long.
It seems your brain likes to take shortcuts and make generalizations. A lot
of generalizations. Which is why we get a lot of things wrong. A mindful
brain can chose images that improve performance! This has big implications
for leaders, teachers, parents, students, and people from all walks of life.
Here is a great article on this topic:
New York Times
July 31, 2007
Who's Minding the Mind?
By Benedict Carey
In a recent experiment, psychologists at Yale altered people's judgments of
a stranger by handing them a cup of coffee.
The study participants, college students, had no idea that their social
instincts were being deliberately manipulated. On the way to the laboratory,
they had bumped into a laboratory assistant, who was holding textbooks, a
clipboard, papers and a cup of hot or iced coffee - and asked for a hand
with the cup.
That was all it took: The students who held a cup of iced coffee rated a
hypothetical person they later read about as being much colder, less social
and more selfish than did their fellow students, who had momentarily held a
cup of hot java.
Findings like this one, as improbable as they seem, have poured forth in
psychological research over the last few years. New studies have found that
people tidy up more thoroughly when there's a faint tang of cleaning liquid
in the air; they become more competitive if there's a briefcase in sight, or
more cooperative if they glimpse words like "dependable" and "support" - all
without being aware of the change, or what prompted it.
Psychologists say that "priming" people in this way is not some form of
hypnotism, or even subliminal seduction; rather, it's a demonstration of how
everyday sights, smells and sounds can selectively activate goals or motives
that people already have.
More fundamentally, the new studies reveal a subconscious brain that is far
more active, purposeful and independent than previously known. Goals,
whether to eat, mate or devour an iced latte, are like neural software
programs that can only be run one at a time, and the unconscious is
perfectly capable of running the program it chooses.
The give and take between these unconscious choices and our rational,
conscious aims can help explain some of the more mystifying realities of
behavior, like how we can be generous one moment and petty the next, or act
rudely at a dinner party when convinced we are emanating charm.
"When it comes to our behavior from moment to moment, the big question is,
'What to do next?' " said John A. Bargh, a professor of psychology at Yale
and a co-author, with Lawrence Williams, of the coffee study, which was
presented at a recent psychology conference. "Well, we're finding that we
have these unconscious behavioral guidance systems that are continually
furnishing suggestions through the day about what to do next, and the brain
is considering and often acting on those, all before conscious awareness."
Dr. Bargh added: "Sometimes those goals are in line with our conscious
intentions and purposes, and sometimes they're not."
Priming the Unconscious
The idea of subliminal influence has a mixed reputation among scientists
because of a history of advertising hype and apparent fraud. In 1957, an ad
man named James Vicary claimed to have increased sales of Coca-Cola and
popcorn at a movie theater in Fort Lee, N.J., by secretly flashing the words
"Eat popcorn" and "Drink Coke" during the film, too quickly to be
consciously noticed. But advertisers and regulators doubted his story from
the beginning, and in a 1962 interview, Mr. Vicary acknowledged that he had
trumped up the findings to gain attention for his business.
Later studies of products promising subliminal improvement, for things like
memory and self-esteem, found no effect.
Some scientists also caution against overstating the implications of the
latest research on priming unconscious goals. The new research "doesn't
prove that consciousness never does anything," wrote Roy Baumeister, a
professor of psychology at Florida State University, in an e-mail message.
"It's rather like showing you can hot-wire a car to start the ignition
without keys. That's important and potentially useful information, but it
doesn't prove that keys don't exist or that keys are useless."
Yet he and most in the field now agree that the evidence for psychological
hot-wiring has become overwhelming. In one 2004 experiment, psychologists
led by Aaron Kay, then at Stanford University and now at the University of
Waterloo, had students take part in a one-on-one investment game with
another, unseen player.
Half the students played while sitting at a large table, at the other end of
which was a briefcase and a black leather portfolio. These students were far
stingier with their money than the others, who played in an identical room,
but with a backpack on the table instead.
The mere presence of the briefcase, noticed but not consciously registered,
generated business-related associations and expectations, the authors argue,
leading the brain to run the most appropriate goal program: compete. The
students had no sense of whether they had acted selfishly or generously.
In another experiment, published in 2005, Dutch psychologists had
undergraduates sit in a cubicle and fill out a questionnaire. Hidden in the
room was a bucket of water with a splash of citrus-scented cleaning fluid,
giving off a faint odor. After completing the questionnaire, the young men
and women had a snack, a crumbly biscuit provided by laboratory staff
members.
The researchers covertly filmed the snack time and found that these students
cleared away crumbs three times more often than a comparison group, who had
taken the same questionnaire in a room with no cleaning scent. "That is a
very big effect, and they really had no idea they were doing it," said Henk
Aarts, a psychologist at Utrecht University and the senior author of the
study.
The Same Brain Circuits
The real-world evidence for these unconscious effects is clear to anyone who
has ever run out to the car to avoid the rain and ended up driving too fast,
or rushed off to pick up dry cleaning and returned with wine and cigarettes
- but no pressed slacks.
The brain appears to use the very same neural circuits to execute an
unconscious act as it does a conscious one. In a study that appeared in the
journal Science in May, a team of English and French neuroscientists
performed brain imaging on 18 men and women who were playing a computer game
for money. The players held a handgrip and were told that the tighter they
squeezed when an image of money flashed on the screen, the more of the loot
they could keep.
As expected, the players squeezed harder when the image of a British pound
flashed by than when the image of a penny did - regardless of whether they
consciously perceived the pictures, many of which flew by subliminally. But
the circuits activated in their brains were similar as well: an area called
the ventral pallidum was particularly active whenever the participants
responded.
"This area is located in what used to be called the reptilian brain, well
below the conscious areas of the brain," said the study's senior author,
Chris Frith, a professor in neuropsychology at University College London who
wrote the book "Making Up The Mind: How the Brain Creates our Mental World."
The results suggest a "bottom-up" decision-making process, in which the
ventral pallidum is part of a circuit that first weighs the reward and
decides, then interacts with the higher-level, conscious regions later, if
at all, Dr. Frith said.
Scientists have spent years trying to pinpoint the exact neural regions that
support conscious awareness, so far in vain. But there's little doubt it
involves the prefrontal cortex, the thin outer layer of brain tissue behind
the forehead, and experiments like this one show that it can be one of the
last neural areas to know when a decision is made.
This bottom-up order makes sense from an evolutionary perspective. The
subcortical areas of the brain evolved first and would have had to help
individuals fight, flee and scavenge well before conscious, distinctly human
layers were added later in evolutionary history. In this sense, Dr. Bargh
argues, unconscious goals can be seen as open-ended, adaptive agents acting
on behalf of the broad, genetically encoded aims - automatic survival
systems.
In several studies, researchers have also shown that, once covertly
activated, an unconscious goal persists with the same determination that is
evident in our conscious pursuits. Study participants primed to be
cooperative are assiduous in their teamwork, for instance, helping others
and sharing resources in games that last 20 minutes or longer. Ditto for
those set up to be aggressive.
This may help explain how someone can show up at a party in good spirits and
then for some unknown reason - the host's loafers? the family portrait on
the wall? some political comment? - turn a little sour, without realizing
the change until later, when a friend remarks on it. "I was rude? Really?
When?"
Mark Schaller, a psychologist at the University of British Columbia, in
Vancouver, has done research showing that when self-protective instincts are
primed - simply by turning down the lights in a room, for instance - people
who are normally tolerant become unconsciously more likely to detect
hostility in the faces of men with neutral expressions.
"Sometimes nonconscious effects can be bigger in sheer magnitude than
conscious ones," Dr. Schaller said, "because we can't moderate stuff we
don't have conscious access to, and the goal stays active."
Until it is satisfied, that is, when the program is subsequently suppressed,
research suggests. In one 2006 study, for instance, researchers had
Northwestern University undergraduates recall an unethical deed from their
past, like betraying a friend, or a virtuous one, like returning lost
property. Afterward, the students had their choice of a gift, an antiseptic
wipe or a pencil; and those who had recalled bad behavior were twice as
likely as the others to take the wipe. They had been primed to
psychologically "cleanse" their consciences.
Once their hands were wiped, the students became less likely to agree to
volunteer their time to help with a graduate school project. Their hands
were clean: the unconscious goal had been satisfied and now was being
suppressed, the findings suggest.
What You Don't Know
Using subtle cues for self-improvement is something like trying to tickle
yourself, Dr. Bargh said: priming doesn't work if you're aware of it.
Manipulating others, while possible, is dicey. "We know that as soon as
people feel they're being manipulated, they do the opposite; it backfires,"
he said.
And researchers do not yet know how or when, exactly, unconscious drives may
suddenly become conscious; or under which circumstances people are able to
override hidden urges by force of will. Millions have quit smoking for
instance, and uncounted numbers have resisted darker urges to misbehave that
they don't even fully understand.
Yet the new research on priming makes it clear that we are not alone in our
own consciousness. We have company, an invisible partner who has strong
reactions about the world that don't always agree with our own, but whose
instincts, these studies clearly show, are at least as likely to be helpful,
and attentive to others, as they are to be disruptive.
End of article.
Remember...pay attention to your attention, be aware of your awareness, be
conscious of your consciousness because what you think, what you say, what
you do is always based upon what you know....and what you know might be
wrong.
In the next Brain Bulletin you will discover 5 great, easy ways to wake up
your brain any time you want!
And always remember: "You are a genius!"
Enjoy your brain,
Terry
www.terrysmall.com
To purchase brain stuff click here
To receive the Brain Bulletin FREE click here
To register for Terry's Seminars click here
This FREE Brain Bulletin goes out to over 21,000 brains. Sign up today to have your copies delivered straight to your email.
|